As the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration works to safely integrate autonomous vehicles onto the nation’s roadways, lawmakers and industry advocates are wrestling with the federal government’s role in regulating a rapidly evolving – and potentially life-saving — technology.
At a Nov. 16 hearing of the Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing and Urban Development and Related Agencies, Chairman Sen. Susan M. Collins (R-Maine) called for balance between innovation and oversight to “help ensure that automakers are able to bring the safety and mobility benefits of autonomous vehicles into the marketplace without unnecessary government regulations.”
The regulatory process is not keeping pace with the technology, according to Alliance for Transportation Innovation (ATI21), a consortium of transportation technology innovators and researchers working with the government to safely deploy autonomous vehicles.
“We see evidence of a significant gap in understanding these technologies within all levels of government,” ATI21 President and CEO Paul Brubaker said at the hearing. “It’s a gap that must be bridged so regulators can better understand when it’s best to lead, follow or move out of the way.”
The Obama administration and the Department of Transportation have laid the regulatory groundwork. Brubaker said DOT’s Federal Automated Vehicles Policy released in September is a good first-step in covering vehicle design and for developing an iterative approach to regulations that could evolve with technology.
Still, the ATI21 is concerned about the policy’s use of existing regulatory tools. Brubaker said the current federal vehicle safety standards governing traditional vehicles, for example, would not be appropriate for autonomous vehicle designs. Additionally, the possible regulatory approaches offered by the federal policy — such as preapproval of designs — are also flawed.
“The rapid development of autonomous vehicles presents us with an opportunity to revisit our regulatory approach and offer reforms that are more suitable to the digital age,” Brubaker said in his testimony.
And the way to improve the regulatory process, he said, is with data. Specifically, with a national central data repository for collecting, storing and analyzing all near-real-time operational and testing data could be used to help industry and NHTSA quickly spot real and potential issues.
It would be a highly secure, trusted, opt-in data repository with incentives to encourage participation. “Such a repository would help us better understand the level of safety and performance, as well as enable us to identify real and emerging potential issues and inform regulators, industry and the public,” Brubaker said. ATI21 recommended establishing an independent federally charted organization to collect and analyze this data.
Cybersecurity is another top concern with autonomous vehicles, and according to NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind, whose agency has been working with industry to take action before incidents occur. Work so far includes supporting an Automotive Information Sharing and Analysis Center within the industry, the recent release of the NHTSA Cybersecurity Best Practices for Modern Vehicles and the industry’s release of its own cybersecurity best practices.
Read more of the original article at GCN.
