Truemag

  • Newsletters
  • Thought Leadership
  • Mobility
  • Safety
  • Work Trucks
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Media Kit
  • Who We Are

Future Federal Fleet Gains at Risk Under New Decentralized Fleet Management Regime

By Adlore Chaudier Ph.D., CFFM, Associate Vice President, Federal Fleet Consulting Services, Mercury Associates

Last year, the Trump administration reversed a decades-old trend toward the centralization of federal agency fleet administration, a move that may prove to be problematic because of a lack of strategic expertise at the agency level to improve fleet operational efficiency and which flies in the face of proof that centralized fleet management is a better approach.

The change came about via Executive Order 13834 that President Trump signed on May 17, 2018, which shifted overall responsibility for fleet strategy from the General Services Administration (GSA) to the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). A month later, the two bodies issued implementation instructions that handed over discretion to each of the federal government’s agencies that operate fleets.

Specifically, the CEQ and OMB are now leaving it to each of those fleets to determine for themselves the best ways toward achieving four statutory mandates: right-sizing, reducing vehicle miles traveled, replacing inefficient vehicles with more fuel-efficient vehicles, and aligning alternative fuel vehicles with a fueling infrastructure.

Since the 1950s, when federal fleet management was initiated by law under GSA, federal fleet management has consistently moved toward greater centralization under both political parties, and within the last two decades has taken significant and successful steps toward improved control.

Centralization: a fleet best practice
Centralization of fleet management authority and responsibility characterizes best-in-class fleet management programs. Fleet management has become a line of business for most organizations, and upper-level management has increasingly understood that fleet-user needs can typically be met more cost effectively through a consolidated approach to fleet management.

The clear trend in the industry has been and remains toward more rather than less consolidation. And to varying degrees, most public sector organizations have developed a centralized fleet management program.

The benefits of centralization have been well documented. They include:

• An effective span of control and clear chain of command;
• A vision sustained and supported via consistently employed communication means and methods;
• Reduced duplication of responsibilities, resulting in greater cost control and efficiency; and
• Enhanced standardization and control over systems, programs, acquisition, reporting, performance metrics, and operations at all organization levels

The fleet points of contact in the field for large, organizationally complex and geographically dispersed agency programs too often lack the level of professional expertise required to achieve the desired level of management and control of the fleet program. Centralization is essential for beginning to overcome this challenge. In general, centralization is the means whereby agencies can most successfully identify and implement the strategies and prioritize the actions they will take to implement the goals listed in the Implementing Instructions.

Agencies must up their game
For federal fleet management to continue to demonstrate increasing control of federal fleet assets, agencies must up their game. They must ensure that they have personnel with professional levels of knowledge and experience overseeing their fleet programs and they must ensure that fleet points of contact in their geographically dispersed operations have relevant training.

The challenges for agencies that own their fleet assets will continue to be significant; the challenges for agencies that lease their vehicles through GSA will be less because it provides greater guidance and control. However, even agencies that lease through GSA must take steps to establish strategies that meet the four overarching goals.

A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) report entitled “DHS Does Not Adequately Manage or Have Enforcement Authority Over Its Components’ Vehicle Fleet Operations” details the centralization/decentralization problem all of the large agencies face. Although published in 2014, the challenges and issues described remain and may well become even more problematic.

After the United States Postal Service, DHS has the second largest civilian federal motor vehicle fleet. Given its complex bureaucratic structure and geographic dispersion, DHS has a decentralized fleet management structure and relies heavily on its 11 components with fleet vehicles to manage, report and control operations. The OIG report Executive Summary states:

“DHS does not adequately manage or have the enforcement authority over its components’ fleet operations to ensure that its motor vehicle fleet composition is right-sized. Each DHS component manages its own vehicle fleet, making it difficult for the DHS Fleet Manager to provide adequate oversight and ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, policies, and directives.”

And having a clear and detailed policy is not, in itself, a solution:

“Although DHS has policies and procedures that delineate roles and responsibilities for managing fleet operations, the components manage their own fleets, making it difficult for the DHS Fleet Manager to provide adequate oversight and ensure compliance with applicable policies.”

Our work with federal fleet programs across numerous agencies and their organizational components has shown that staffing is insufficient to the challenge. Even more challenging is the fact that the organizational components often resist headquarters control and the characteristics of their respective fleet operations may markedly differ.

Long-term federal fleet gains at risk
At first glance, the direction set by E.O. 13834 can appear reasonable and positive. However, the clear and overt shift in control of federal fleet management to CEQ and OMB may prove problematic. Although CEQ and OMB have played a significant role in federal fleet management for at least a decade, the lead agencies have historically been GSA (particularly the Office of Governmentwide Policy) and DOE, where assigned personnel have possessed background, experience and knowledge in fleet management.

The push toward decentralization of oversight and control to the headquarters offices of Executive Branch agencies places a greater burden upon them to manage and control their fleet operations, particularly where the fleet is owned. As the DHS OIG report suggests, however, even more decentralization may well occur as the organizational components within each agency push for greater autonomy. The long-term effort to centralize federal fleet management by all administrations since the 1950s may be at risk.

 

 

Sep 27, 2019Janice
Hyundai to Set Up $4-Billion Joint Venture to Develop Driverless CarsSeeing is Believing: Eye-Tracking Technology Could Help Make Driving Safer
Recent Posts
  • Electric F-150 Lightnings Save the Day with Power in Kentucky Flood Response
  • UPS Refuses to Install Air Conditioning in 150-Degree Delivery Trucks
  • Ford Summit Addresses Chip Shortage Hindering EV Revolution
  • Gas Prices See Fastest Decline in Over a Decade, Down 83 Cents Since Mid-June
  • Three GOP Senators Want to Protect Motorists’ Right to Drive Drunk
  • AFLA Announces New Board Leaders
  • Tesla Vehicles are Increasing Hertz’s Customer Satisfaction, Still Adding More EVs to the Fleet
  • Hyundai, Kia Models at Higher Risk of Theft, and Of Course It’s on TikTok
  • Holman, Electrada, Ferguson Launch Groundbreaking Electric Vehicle Program
  • A Call to Action: The New Google Analytics 4 Becomes a Business Tool Thanks to AI
ASSOCIATION NEWS
AFLA Announces New Board Leaders
Registration Now Open for NETS Hybrid Conference Event ~ October 5-6, 2022
NAFA: EV Tools of the Trade Seminar Series
AFLA 2022: Forward Together with Shola Richards
NAFA: U.S. Legislative Update Webinar
NAFA Still Basking in Afterglow of Successful I & E
NAFA Leadership Experience ’22: Expanding Influence, Energizing Innovation
TECHNOLOGY
Ford Summit Addresses Chip Shortage Hindering EV Revolution
GM OnStar & Amazon Alexa Team Up for Safety Beyond the Road
Electric Ford F-150 Lightning Goes to the Police Academy, Sprouts Light Bar
Solar Chargers Will Be a Total Game-Changer for EV Owners
With ‘EV Live’ GM Jumpstarts the Electric Vehicle Conversation
GM Wants to Make EV Road Trips Easier With Countrywide Charging Network
EV Road Trips: An Ounce of Prevention Saves a Pound of Stress
CONFERENCES & WEBINARS
Registration Now Open for NETS Hybrid Conference Event ~ October 5-6, 2022
Forward Together: AFLA 2022 Corporate Fleet Conference
NAFA: EV Tools of the Trade Seminar Series
AFLA 2022: Forward Together with Shola Richards
NAFA: U.S. Legislative Update Webinar
NAFA Still Basking in Afterglow of Successful I & E
NAFA Leadership Experience ’22: Expanding Influence, Energizing Innovation
INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS
AFLA Announces New Board Leaders
RTA Earns 2022 Great Place to Work Certification™
J. D. Power APEAL Study: High Gas Prices Impact Ownership Satisfaction
Bain Capital, ADIA to Acquire Merchants Fleet
Forward Together: AFLA 2022 Corporate Fleet Conference
NETS and eDriving Offer Driver Safety & Privacy Webinar
Athene, Lead Investor of Wheels Donlen, to Acquire LeasePlan USA

Fleet Management Weekly Newsletter Archive
Access to back issues of the FMW newsletter.

FMW Mobility
How mobility is rapidly changing the fleet management landscape.

Newsletter

Subscribe

FMW Fleet Videos
Video clips of industry leaders speaking on a variety of engaging hot topics in fleet.

2014-2020 © Fleet Management Weekly