Everyone sees distracted drivers on the road these days, and almost everyone suspects that texting and driving is contributing to an alarming rise in traffic fatalities.
But is it? Some researchers, including an insurance institute whose crash-testing has been regarded as more stringent than the federal government’s, say appearances may be deceiving: it’s still too soon to say whether smartphones have made our highways less safe.
Yet, the perception that smartphones have created more distracted drivers and crashes has become widespread, and not just in the United States.
The European Traffic Safety Council, responding to the first increase in traffic fatalities since 2001, said in a report this year that a possible factor could be the apparent slowdown in police enforcement against illegal use of cellphones. Last week, a major Scandinavian insurer warned investors that claims had risen sharply in the region, at least in part because of distracted driving.
In Canada, police reported that despite writing more than $1 million worth of tickets, drivers still can’t seem to put their phones down. In Kansas, where traffic deaths rose 16 percent this year, transportation officials blamed distracted driving as one of the contributors.
Earlier this month, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) released data showing a 10 percent jump in traffic fatalities in the first part of this year compared to the previous year. Editorials have since appeared in newspapers such as Newsday, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, and others singling out smartphones as a possible culprit and urging people to hang up and drive. Some urged tougher penalties and increased enforcement.
But NHTSA has been more cautious in its assessment of distracted driving’s role in rising highway fatalities. The agency has emphasized that the more likely causes are the strength of the national economy, the low cost of fuel and other human error, such as the failure to buckle up.
Read more of the original article in The Washington Post.
